Alas, it really depends on your point of view.
You may ask, like Hercule Poirot, "We saw the same thing, shouldn't we make the same conclusion?"
Then, let's go through the facts:
- 6 of the 18 issues on the list did horribly (#55, 274, 643, 1071, 1163, and 8056)
- 6 prospered well (#87, 177, 345, 347, 984, 1052)
- the remaining 6 just followed the market trend (#125, 682, 711, 900, 991, 1038)
However, only one of the issues had its value fell to zero (#8056); all other 5 that decreased in price had some residual value (average 37%). In contrast, the 6 whose price rose dramatically made an average of 6-fold return - far much more to compensate for the loss. In fact, if you made a portfolio with equal weight of the 18 items in 2001, the value increased by 2.7 fold after 10 years, or a 70% extra return as compared to putting your money on Hong Kong Tracker Fund.
1 comment:
Your figures are only applicable on an intelligent value investor like you.
Post a Comment