(Maybe they would, for the same argument, also ban our senior government officials from coming to the campus and promote the proposal for political reform.)
But it is your fault; you are all mistaken - and do not comprehend the meaning of neutralism.
It means they are standing on the central point (alas, neutral) of the field, or, in other words, sitting on the fence.
Therefore, if one side seizes power and dominates, they belong to the winning side.
Of course, if the wind changes in direction and the opposite side takes its turn, they would still fall on to the winning side.
Haven't you heard of market economics ?
PS. Don't laugh at my definition of neutral. It is not my invention. You may not know, but the United States Senate is chaired - according to the regulation - by the Vice President, who should in theory be neutral. What it means is he would not vote, which, in reality, implies that he only stands on the winning side.
No comments:
Post a Comment