Shortly before the Chinese New Year, I was summoned to a
dinner with representatives from other peripheral hospitals that take part in
the teaching of our third year medical students.
I shall not tell you what we discussed. Nonetheless, one
topic that repeatedly appeared amongst our own colleagues was brought up again
by a consultant from another hospital:
Should we take the
student attendance for our teaching?
Of course there are pros and cons. Some argue our student
are (chronologically, at least) adults and we should let them vote by their
feet. Others believe it is a good way to monitor their progress and ensure they
have sufficient clinical exposure.
When this very topic was brought up again on the dinner
table, I must say I had little interest because it seemed certain that the
whole argument of both sides would appear again and no conclusion would be
reached.
But I was (happily) wrong. A physician from another hospital
said, “I don’t see any reason not taking the attendance – we are doing the same
for all students from the other medical school since the last millennium!”
Alas, this is the rare occasion that I think it is a good
idea to follow the practice of our friends from the other side of the harbor.
No comments:
Post a Comment